Isolation, Structural Characteristics Analysis of a Vigna unguiculata Polysaccharide VUP80-3 and Its Protective Effect on GES-1 Cells In Vitro

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) is one of the main edible legume vegetables in China, and it can improve spleen and stomach function. A polysaccharide component (VUP80-3) has been isolated from V. unguiculata in this study. The average molecular weight of VUP80-3 is 6.43 × 104 Da, and the main monosaccharide group is glucose. The mass ratio of monosaccharide groups in the polysaccharide was glucose:galactose:arabinose:rhamnose:xylose:mannose:fucose = 152.36:24.50:16.53:8.13:1.26:0.97:0.82. NMR analysis showed that VUP80-3 has →4)-α-D-Galp (1→ and →4)-α-D-Glcp(1→ main chain and →3,4)-β-D-Glcp(1→, →4,6)-α-D-Glcp(1→ branch chains, and the terminal sugar is α-D-Glcp(1→. Biological activity test results showed that VUP80-3 at 1000 μg·mL−1 significantly increased the activity of ethanol injured GES-1 cells (p < 0.01) and significantly reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS) in ethanol injured GES-1 cells and inflammatory factors (IL-8, IL-1β and TNF-α,) in GES-1 cells. This compound also reduced the apoptosis rate (p < 0.05), thereby significantly reducing the oxidative damage caused by ethanol in GES-1 cells. Therefore, VUP80-3 is a potential drug to protect the gastric mucosa from damage.


Introduction
Approximately, 10% of the world's people suffer from peptic ulcer diseases, of which gastric ulcer is the most common [1]. Alcohol can cause acute gastritis and damage to the gastric mucosa [2]. With the improvement of socioeconomic standards, alcohol consumption has increased significantly. Acute or chronic damage of the gastric mucosa caused by excessive or long-term alcohol consumption is increasing [3] and is becoming a main inducement of gastric mucosal damage. Gastric mucosal damage is the early pathological reaction of gastric ulcers. Therefore, prevention and treatment strategies for ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage are key to mitigating alcohol stimulated gastric ulcers.
Polysaccharides are natural macromolecules with various biological activities [4]. These biomacromolecules have been used as adjunctive therapy for many diseases in recent years. Many natural polysaccharides have been proven to improve intestinal damage and increase antioxidant activity [5]. Therefore, some researchers have attempted to use bioactive polysaccharides to treat gastric ulcers. For example, Liu et al. [6] found in the rat model that Ginseng polysaccharide (GPS) can treat gastric ulcers by improving ulcer index (UI) and increasing levels of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in gastric juice. Many researchers have found that, in the rat model, aloe polysaccharides can also prevent and treat gastric ulcers [7][8][9]. Fucopolysaccharide is also used to protect the gastric mucosa and treat gastric ulcers because of its role in improving the gastrointestinal tract. Wang et al. [10] showed that taking 100 mg·Kg −1 of fucoidan every day can effectively absorption peaks at 1643 cm −1 and 1408.50 cm −1 were caused by the bending vibration of the C-H bond, and peaks at 1020 cm −1 and 1078 cm −1 were ascribed to the stretching vibration of C-O of C-O-C or C-O-H, which also indicates the existence of a pyran ring in VUP80-3 [24,25]. There was a characteristic peak of α-glycoside bond at 764 cm −1 [26].

Molecular Weight of VUP80-3
After freeze-drying, a gray powder (VUP80-3) was obtained. The GPC analysis results showed that VUP80-3 exhibited a single peak. According to calculations based on the molecular weight standard curve ( Figure S1), the molecular weight (Mw) of VUP80-3 was 6.43 × 10 4 Da, which is within the middle range of the molecular weights reported for polysaccharides [19].

FTIR Spectra
The IR of VUP80-3 is shown in Figure 2. The data showed that there was a wide peak at 3600-3200 cm −1 of sugars, which was the stretching vibration of the -OH in the sugar molecule, while C-H stretching and binding vibrations appeared at 3000-2800 cm −1 [20]. Additionally, the absorption peak at 1400-1200 cm −1 was the variable angle vibration of C-H [21]. As shown in Figure 2, VUP80-3 yielded a large absorption peak at 3433 cm −1 , an absorption peak at 2927 cm −1 and an absorption peak at 1232 cm −1 . These were characteristic peaks of carbohydrates [22], which showed that VUP80-3 was a carbohydrate compound. The absorption peak of 1665-1635 cm −1 was due to the bound water [23]. The absorption peaks at 1643 cm −1 and 1408.50 cm −1 were caused by the bending vibration of the C-H bond, and peaks at 1020 cm −1 and 1078 cm −1 were ascribed to the stretching vibration of C-O of C-O-C or C-O-H, which also indicates the existence of a pyran ring in VUP80-3 [24,25]. There was a characteristic peak of α-glycoside bond at 764 cm −1 [26].

Monosaccharide Analysis of VUP80-3
The monosaccharide composition of VUP80-3 was analyzed by Trifluoroacetic acid hydrolysis and ion chromatography. The results showed that there were seven main monosaccharide peaks in VUP80-3. Among them, the peak of glucose was the highest, indicat-

Monosaccharide Analysis of VUP80-3
The monosaccharide composition of VUP80-3 was analyzed by Trifluoroacetic acid hydrolysis and ion chromatography. The results showed that there were seven main monosaccharide peaks in VUP80-3. Among them, the peak of glucose was the highest, indicating that glucose was the main monosaccharide group with the largest content in VUP80-3, followed by Galactose and Arabinose. According to the peak area calculation, the mass ratio of each monosaccharide group in the polysaccharide is as follows: glucose:galactose:arabinose: rhamnose:xylose:mannose:fucose = 152.36:24.50:16.53:8.13:1.26:0.97:0.82. Among them, glucose accounted for the highest proportion and was the main monosaccharide group of VUP80-3.

Methylation Analysis Results
Methylation analysis can provide detailed information of glycosidic bond types and detect monosaccharide units with less content. However, methylation analysis is not an independent analytic method. Therefore, it is often combined with other analysis methods to determine the glycosyl connection mode and location of the polysaccharide carbon chain [27].
According to the methylation test results, VUP80-3 was mainly composed of 10 carbohydrate units. The ratio of monosaccharide residues of methylation was consistent with the result of the monosaccharide analysis (for the TIC chromatogram see Figure S2). This indicates that the sugar chain was not decomposed during methylation (Table 1).

NMR Spectroscopy Analysis
The polysaccharide signal in 1 H NMR was concentrated at δ 3-6 ppm ( Figure 3A,B). The β-anomeric hydrogen signals were distributed in δ 4.5-4.8 ppm, and α-anomeric hydrogen signals were distributed in δ 4.8-5.8 ppm. The 1 H NMR signal of this sample was mainly distributed in δ 3.2-5.8 ppm. Six coupling signal peaks in the δ 4.5-5.8 ppm anomeric hydrogen signal region indicated six sugar residues. The non-anomeric hydrogen signals were concentrated in the δ 3.2-4.2 ppm area. Due to the serious overlap of individual signals, it was also necessary to assign the chemical shifts of H2-H6 of sugar residues A, B and C by combining the COSY and HSQC spectra.
The polysaccharide signal in 1 H NMR was concentrated at δ 3-6 ppm ( Figure 3A,B). The β-anomeric hydrogen signals were distributed in δ 4.5-4.8 ppm, and α-anomeric hydrogen signals were distributed in δ 4.8-5.8 ppm. The 1 H NMR signal of this sample was mainly distributed in δ 3.2-5.8 ppm. Six coupling signal peaks in the δ 4.5-5.8 ppm anomeric hydrogen signal region indicated six sugar residues. The non-anomeric hydrogen signals were concentrated in the δ 3.2-4.2 ppm area. Due to the serious overlap of individual signals, it was also necessary to assign the chemical shifts of H2-H6 of sugar residues A, B and C by combining the COSY and HSQC spectra. As is shown in Figure 3, the anomeric carbon signals of VUP80-3 in 13 C NMR were mainly concentrated at 95-110 ppm, and six coupling signal peaks were identified. Additionally, the chemical shifts were δ 110.36 ppm, δ 107.22 ppm, δ 103.77 ppm, δ 102.45 ppm, Figure 3. Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of polysaccharide VUP80-3. (A) is 1 H NMR spectra, (B) is 13 C NMR spectra, (C) is COSY spectra, (D) is NOESY spectra, (E) is HSQC spectra, (F) is a partial enlarged view of HSQC spectra, (G) is HSQC spectra, and (H) is a partial enlarged view of HMBC spectra.  Figure 3 and Table 2, we analyzed the possible structures and connection mode of UVP80-3. We found a coupling signal between H1 (5.42 ppm) and C4 (79.47 ppm) of sugar residue A, C1 (102.45 ppm) and H4 (3.68 ppm) of sugar residue A, and H4 (36.5 ppm) of sugar residue B, as well as C1 (107.22 ppm) of sugar residue C and H4 (3.69 ppm) of sugar residue A. We also found that there was a cross peak between H1 and H4 of residue A and H4 of residue B. From this, we inferred that the main chain of UVP80-3 may be "→4)-α-D-Glcp(1→" and "→4)-α-D-Galp(1→", while branched chains may be "→3,4)-β-D-Glcp(1→", "→4,6)-α-D-Glcp(1→" and "α-D-Glcp(1→".

SEM Analysis
At 5000× magnification ( Figure 4) the surface of the polysaccharide VUP80-3 presented a mass or clastic accumulation, and the surface was uneven with small grain folds. At 20,000× magnification, the surface of VUP80-3 presented two different morphologies, some of which were cylindrical particles with smooth surfaces and others which were semicircular particles with regular structures and dispersed molecules. Certain polysaccharides present clastic accumulation, with uneven surfaces and irregular geometric shapes. This showed that there was a repulsive force between polysaccharide molecules, and the intermolecular attraction was small [28].

Effect of VUP80-3 on the Activity of Ethanol-Induced GES-1 Damaged Cells
V. unguiculata can improve spleen and stomach function and eliminate gastrointestinal inflammation. Regular consumption can prevent and treat gastrointestinal inflammation [29]. V. unguiculata is rich in polysaccharides, which are also considered active ingredients which protect the gastric mucosa. However, it is not clear how these polysaccharides protect the stomach. Therefore, we preliminarily explored the protective effect of soybean polysaccharide VUP80-3 on injured GES-1 cells.

Establishment of GES-1 Cell Injury Model
First, we established a model of ethanol damage on GES-1 cells and analyzed its effect on the proliferation of these cells. GES-1 cells were treated with different concentrations of ethanol. After 8 h of treatment, the proliferation activity of GES-1 cells was detected using the CCK-8 method. As shown in Figure 5a, the low ethanol concentration had no significant effect on the proliferation activity of cells (p > 0.05). With the increase in ethanol concentration, the proliferation activity of GES-1 cells showed a significant downward trend. At 0.8 mol·L −1 , proliferation activity was only 49.7% of the control, and compared with the control group, the difference was significant (p < 0.05). When the concentration reached 1.0 mol·L −1 , the proliferation activity of GES-1 cells was 41.98%, and there was no significant difference compared with the activity at 0.8 mol·L −1 (p > 0.05). Therefore, 0.8mol·L −1 ethanol was used to establish the GES-1 cell injury model.

Effect of VUP80-3 on the Activity of Ethanol-Induced GES-1 Damaged Cells
V. unguiculata can improve spleen and stomach function and eliminate gastrointestinal inflammation. Regular consumption can prevent and treat gastrointestinal inflammation [29]. V. unguiculata is rich in polysaccharides, which are also considered active ingredients which protect the gastric mucosa. However, it is not clear how these polysaccharides protect the stomach. Therefore, we preliminarily explored the protective effect of soybean polysaccharide VUP80-3 on injured GES-1 cells.

Establishment of GES-1 Cell Injury Model
First, we established a model of ethanol damage on GES-1 cells and analyzed its effect on the proliferation of these cells. GES-1 cells were treated with different concentrations of ethanol. After 8 h of treatment, the proliferation activity of GES-1 cells was detected using the CCK-8 method. As shown in Figure 5a, the low ethanol concentration had no significant effect on the proliferation activity of cells (p > 0.05). With the increase in ethanol concentration, the proliferation activity of GES-1 cells showed a significant downward trend. At 0.8 mol•L −1 , proliferation activity was only 49.7% of the control, and compared with the control group, the difference was significant (p < 0.05). When the concentration reached 1.0 mol•L −1 , the proliferation activity of GES-1 cells was 41.98%, and there was no significant difference compared with the activity at 0.8 mol•L −1 (p > 0.05). Therefore, 0.8mol•L −1 ethanol was used to establish the GES-1 cell injury model.
In order to investigate the effect of VUP80-3 on the viability of GES-1 cells injured by ethanol, we used three VUP80-3 concentrations, namely a low (250 μg•mL −1 ), medium (500 Moreover, the improvement observed in the treated groups was concentration dependent. Among them, the activity of GES-1 cells of the high treatment group (1000 μg•mL −1 ) was significantly higher than that in the model group (p < 0.01).

Effect of Polysaccharide VUP80-3 on ROS in Injured GES-1 Cells
Studies have shown that free radicals play an important role in ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury. The levels of lipid peroxides and free radicals in the gastric mucosa after chronic alcohol consumption are very high [30]. The reason may be that ethanol can promote excessive production of ROS. ROS can directly damage the capillary endothelial cells of the gastric mucosa, and depletion of mucosal antioxidant defense, leading to excessive formation of lipid peroxide Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and its substrate, re- In order to investigate the effect of VUP80-3 on the viability of GES-1 cells injured by ethanol, we used three VUP80-3 concentrations, namely a low (250 µg·mL −1 ), medium (500 µg·mL −1 ) and high concentration (1000 µg·mL −1 ). Additionally, the control group (untreated normal cells) and the model group (ethanol injury group not treated with VUP80-3) were used for comparison. The proliferative activity of the model group was significantly lower than the control (Figure 5b) (p < 0.05). Compared with the model group, each treatment group exhibited increased activity in damaged GES-1 cells at varying degrees. Moreover, the improvement observed in the treated groups was concentration dependent. Among them, the activity of GES-1 cells of the high treatment group (1000 µg·mL −1 ) was significantly higher than that in the model group (p < 0.01).

Effect of Polysaccharide VUP80-3 on ROS in Injured GES-1 Cells
Studies have shown that free radicals play an important role in ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury. The levels of lipid peroxides and free radicals in the gastric mucosa after chronic alcohol consumption are very high [30]. The reason may be that ethanol can promote excessive production of ROS. ROS can directly damage the capillary endothelial cells of the gastric mucosa, and depletion of mucosal antioxidant defense, leading to excessive formation of lipid peroxide Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and its substrate, reduced glutathione (GSH) [31]. Moreover, it can promote macrophages and multinucleated leukocytes to adsorb on the surface of endothelial cells, causing plasma exudation and bleeding. This reduces the blood flow of the gastric mucosa, leading to reduced secretion of mucus and bicarbonate and to H+ reflux. H+ regurgitation can also damage the vascular system of the mucosa, causing bleeding in the stomach cavity and aggravating the degree of tissue ischemia. Concomitantly, due to the change in pH in the mucosa, xanthine oxidase persists, producing oxygen free radicals continuously and further aggravating the tissue damage [32]. ROS play a significant role in ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury.
This experiment detected the change in ROS in injured GES-1 cells before and after treatment with VUP80-3. Additionally, the control group and the model group were set. As shown in Figure 6, the concentration of ROS in GES-1 cells treated with ethanol increased significantly compared with that in the control group (p < 0.05). Nonetheless, each group treated with VUP80-3 exhibited decreased ROS content in a concentrationdependent manner. At medium (500 µg·mL −1 ) and high concentrations (1000 µg·mL −1 ), the polysaccharide VUP80-3 significantly reduced the ROS content in the injured cells (41.6% and 61.7% lower, respectively; p < 0.05) compared with that in the model group. These data demonstrated that the polysaccharide VUP80-3 can effectively reduce ROS in ethanol damaged GES-1 cells, thereby alleviating the damage to these cells.

Effect of VUP80-3 on the Secretion of Inflammatory Factors by Injured GES-1 Cells
Gastric mucosal injury can activate the immune system in the body leading to the activation of various inflammatory cells, recruitment to inflammatory sites and secretion of a variety of inflammatory cytokines [33]. Therefore, gastric mucosal injury leads to the inflammatory reaction of gastric mucosal tissue. TNF-α is a cell regulatory protein with important biological functions and is produced by the body under external stimulation. Additionally, it is considered an inflammatory protein, closely related to injury. After ethanol damage to the gastric mucosa, TNF-α expression was significantly increased. IL-1β can stimulate various immune and inflammatory cells, promote the release of inflammatory proteins and mediators, have a chemotactic effect on neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes, and enhance the inflammatory response [34]. After ethanol damage to the gastric mucosa, the immune inflammatory factor IL-1β will also increase significantly [35]. However, as a neutrophil chemotactic and activating factor, IL-8 can activate neutrophils to cause a local inflammatory reaction and gastric mucosal damage [36]. Studies have suggested that when the parietal cells secrete less H+, the inflammatory response is weakened and the expression of nuclear factor (NF)-kB is gradually reduced, further reducing inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-8. In turn, the inflammatory cells will gradually reduce, and the ulcer will gradually heal [37]. Therefore, drugs that interfere with the production of inflammatory factors may reduce the damage to the gastric mucosa. Considering this, we examined the secretion of inflammatory factors by injured GES-1 cells treated with polysaccharide VUP80-3 in vitro. Gastric mucosal injury can activate the immune system in the body leading to the activation of various inflammatory cells, recruitment to inflammatory sites and secretion of a variety of inflammatory cytokines [33]. Therefore, gastric mucosal injury leads to the inflammatory reaction of gastric mucosal tissue. TNF-α is a cell regulatory protein with important biological functions and is produced by the body under external stimulation. Additionally, it is considered an inflammatory protein, closely related to injury. After ethanol damage to the gastric mucosa, TNF-α expression was significantly increased. IL-1β can stimulate various immune and inflammatory cells, promote the release of inflammatory proteins and mediators, have a chemotactic effect on neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes, and enhance the inflammatory response [34]. After ethanol damage to the gastric mucosa, the immune inflammatory factor IL-1β will also increase significantly [35]. However, as a neutrophil chemotactic and activating factor, IL-8 can activate neutrophils to cause a local inflammatory reaction and gastric mucosal damage [36]. Studies have suggested that when the parietal cells secrete less H+, the inflammatory response is weakened and the expression of nuclear factor (NF)-kB is gradually reduced, further reducing inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-8. In turn, the inflammatory cells will gradually reduce, and the ulcer will gradually heal [37]. Therefore, drugs that interfere with the production of inflammatory factors may reduce the damage to the gastric mucosa. Considering this, we examined the secretion of inflammatory factors by injured GES-1 cells treated with polysaccharide VUP80-3 in vitro.
The results (Table 3) showed that the level of inflammatory factors in the model group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.01), indicating that ethanol treatment caused damage to GES-1 cells leading to increased IL-8, TNF-α and IL-1β cytokine secretion by inflammatory cells. Compared with the model group, the VUP80- The results (Table 3) showed that the level of inflammatory factors in the model group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.01), indicating that ethanol treatment caused damage to GES-1 cells leading to increased IL-8, TNF-α and IL-1β cytokine secretion by inflammatory cells. Compared with the model group, the VUP80-3 treatment groups exhibited decreased levels of inflammatory factors. At a high concentration (1000 µg·mL −1 ), VUP80-3 significantly reduced the levels of TNF-α (p < 0.01), IL-1β (p < 0.05) and IL-8 (p < 0.01) in injured cells. These data indicate that VUP80-3 at 1000 µg·mL −1 can inhibit the expression of gastric mucosal inflammatory factors, thus preventing further damage to the gastric mucosa by these inflammatory cytokines and enabling the repair of the gastric mucosa. Note: Data were expressed as mean ± SD from three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 when compared with the model group.

Effect of Polysaccharide VUP80-3 on Apoptosis of Injured GES-1 Cells
Research shows that the pathogenesis of ethanol-induced gastric injury involves mechanisms other than oxidative stress and gastritis [38]. ROS trigger apoptosis in the gastric mucosa, which also plays an important role in gastric mucosal injury. Therefore, reducing apoptosis is an effective way for cells to resist oxidative damage. To verify whether the resistance provided by VUP80-3 to cell oxidation is related to the reduction in apoptosis, flow cytometry was used to analyze cell changes in each treatment group.
The flow cytometry results are shown in Figure 7. Compared with the control group, the apoptosis rate of GES-1 cells in the model group was significantly increased (p < 0.01). This indicated that ethanol treatment caused apoptosis in gastric mucosal epidermal cells, which may also be an important reason for ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage. The level of apoptosis in each polysaccharide treatment group decreased. However, the low concentration (250 µg·mL −1 ) had no significant effect on the apoptosis level of injured GES-1 cells. With the increase in polysaccharide concentration, the apoptosis level of cells decreased gradually. The medium concentration group (500 µg·mL −1 ) exhibited 38.9% less apoptosis than the model group (p < 0.05). At the high concentration (1000 µg·mL −1 ), the level of apoptosis in the polysaccharide treatment group was the lowest (71.7% lower) compared to that in the model group. Compared with the model group, there was a very significant difference (p < 0.01), and compared with the control group, there was no significant difference in the level of apoptosis. The results showed that VUP80-3 could significantly reduce the apoptosis rate of injured GES-1 cells at 1000 µg·mL −1 and restore it to the level of normal cells. Therefore, reducing apoptosis is another way for VUP80-3 to protect the damaged GES-1 cells and enable the repair of gastric mucosal damage. This result may also be related to the extremely significant reduction of the ROS level in the injured GES-1 cells in the high concentration group.

Discussion
The incidence rate of acute or chronic gastritis and gastric ulcer due to the damage of gastric mucosal epithelium caused by drinking has been rising, which has become a serious problem affecting health in the drinking culture [39]. Therefore, protecting the gastric mucosa is key to treating these diseases and is a major clinical challenge. At present, the drugs used to treat gastric mucosal injury mainly include antacids, proton pump inhibitors and histamine H2 receptor antagonists. The main mechanism of these drugs is to achieve gastric mucosal protection by inhibiting gastric acid secretion, neutralizing gastric

Discussion
The incidence rate of acute or chronic gastritis and gastric ulcer due to the damage of gastric mucosal epithelium caused by drinking has been rising, which has become a serious problem affecting health in the drinking culture [39]. Therefore, protecting the gastric mucosa is key to treating these diseases and is a major clinical challenge. At present, the drugs used to treat gastric mucosal injury mainly include antacids, proton pump inhibitors and histamine H2 receptor antagonists. The main mechanism of these drugs is to achieve gastric mucosal protection by inhibiting gastric acid secretion, neutralizing gastric acid, inhibiting the hydrogen potassium ATPase on the parietal cells of gastric mucosa, or selectively binding to the histamine H2 receptor and competitively antagonizing the effect of histamine on the H2 receptor, thereby inhibiting gastric acid secretion [40]. However, these drugs can cause side-effects that cannot be ignored, such as hepatitis, nephritis, osteoporotic fracture and gastrin [32]. Therefore, exploring new therapeutic targets and finding safe and effective drugs for gastric mucosal protection were important tasks in the treatment of gastric diseases. In this study, we found that 1000 µg·mL −1 of VUP80-3 can significantly increase the vitality of ethanol damaged GES-1 cells (p < 0.01), significantly reduce the levels of ROS and inflammatory factors in ethanol damaged GES-1 cells (p < 0.05), and also reduce the rate of cell apoptosis (p < 0.05), significantly reducing the oxidative damage of GES-1 cells caused by ethanol, thus achieving the goal of repairing damaged gastric mucosa cells. Therefore, it can be speculated that VUP80-3 may reduce cell apoptosis rate by reducing ROS and inflammatory factors, thereby repairing the gastric mucosa. The principle of action was different from existing gastric mucosal protective drugs. Therefore, this study may provide new ideas for drug research to protect gastric mucosal damage.
With the continuous improvement of food science technology and medical level as well as the change in people's diet concepts, bean food is becoming more and more popular. Legumes include soybeans (Glycine max), red beans (Vigna angularis), mung beans (Vigna radiata), black beans (Glycine max), lentils (Lablab purpureus), cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata), kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), etc. Polysaccharides are a type of natural polymer compounds that, together with nucleic acids, proteins, etc., determine the functionality of species [41]. In recent years, plant polysaccharides have become a research hotspot due to their wide sources and important biological activities [42]. Legume polysaccharides belong to plant polysaccharides, and as one of the active components of beans, they have gradually attracted widespread attention. For example, glycine max polysaccharide can promote the generation of myelocytes in bone tissue, stimulate the production of hematopoietic growth factors in splenocyte, and also promote the gene expression of neutrophil colony-stimulating factor [43]. Wu et al. [44] studied the effects of black bean water-soluble polysaccharide on the expression of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in human blood. The results showed that black bean polysaccharide could induce the expression of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Lablab purpureus polysaccharides played an important role in antioxidant and immune functions, as well as in protecting neuronal cells from apoptosis. Hu et al. [45] found that lentil polysaccharides (WHBP) can stimulate a significant increase in nerve cell viability and also resist hypoxic neuronal apoptosis. Bean polysaccharides have a certain preventive effect on colon cancer [46].
In recent years, research on legumes has mostly focused on common legume varieties such as soybeans and mung beans, while research on cowpeas has only just begun. For example, Cheng et al. [47] found that the scavenging effect of cowpea bound extract on FRAP, ABTS and oxygen free radicals was significantly higher than that of free extract, and the scavenging effect of free extract on DPPH free radicals was also significantly higher than that of bound extract. Cowpea polysaccharide can significantly improve the glycogen content, FBG, TG, TC, LDL-C, ISI and the number of islet cells in diabetes mice [48]. Lai et al. [49] isolated and purified two acidic polysaccharide components, MP1 and MP2, from cowpea skin. Both were heteropolysaccharides, containing 9.9% and 36.4% aldehyde acids, respectively. MP1 is composed of mannose with a molecular weight of 83 kDa, and MP2 is composed of rhamnose and galactose with a molecular weight of 45 kDa. Yang et al. [50] used ultrasonic assistive technology to prepare cowpea total polysaccharide, which can eliminate DPPH free radicals and ABTS free radicals. In this study, we obtained a new cowpea polysaccharide VUP80-3 by ethanol fractionation precipitation combined with ion exchange resin separation. This polysaccharide was different from the reported cowpea polysaccharide, which was mainly composed of glucose, galactose, arabinose, rhamnose, xylose, mannose and fucose, did not contain uronic acid, and its molecular weight was 6.43 × 10 4 Da. Due to the structural characteristics (monosaccharide composition, molecular weight and main chain) of VUP80-3 being different from the previously reported cowpea polysaccharides, there were significant differences in its activity. This study found for the first time that cowpea polysaccharide VUP80-3 has a protective effect on ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage, and there have been no other relevant reports so far.

Preparation of V. unguiculata Polysaccharide
The V. unguiculata polysaccharide was obtained using the improved method of Fan et al. [51]. Firstly, V. Unguiculata was dried at 60 • C to a constant weight, crushed, and passed through a 40 mesh sieve. A total of 50 g of V. unguiculata powder was sequentially refluxed with 500 mL petroleum ether and 500 mL anhydrous ethanol, which was then filtered. The extraction was repeated three times and the filtrate was discarded. Then, 500 mL of distilled water was added to the filter residue for reflux extraction for 2 h; this was filtered, and the filtrate was collected. The Sevag reagent (n-butanol:chloroform = 1:4) extraction method was used to remove proteins from the polysaccharide. Next, the extraction solution was accurately measured, anhydrous ethanol was added until the ethanol content in the system reached 60%, the solution was filtered, and the precipitate was discarded. Anhydrous ethanol was continuously added to the filtrate until the ethanol content in the system was 80%; then the solution was filtered, and the precipitate was collected. Then the precipitation was dialyzed by using a dialysis membrane (7000 Da) for 48 h, and a crude polysaccharide sample was obtained, freeze-dried and labeled as C-VUP80. C-VUP80 was dissolved in deionized water and purified by AB-8 (Polystyrene-type weakly polar adsorption resin) and ADS-7 (Macroporous adsorption resin) columns to remove residual pigments and proteins. Then the effluent was collected and freeze-dried to obtain the VUP80 polysaccharide.
A total of 1.0 g of VUP80 was dissolved in 30 mL of ddH 2 O, then separated by DEAEcellulose column (2.6 × 30 cm). Elution conditions were as follows: Elution solution: ddH 2 O, 0.1 M NaCl and 0.2 M NaCl, at a flow rate of 1.0 mL·min −1 at room temperature. A fully automatic partial collector was used to collect sewage at a rate of 8.0 mL·Tub −1 . The absorbance value of the effluent was measured at 490 nm by using the phenol sulfuric acid method.

Infrared Spectrum Analysis
A total of 1 mg of the polysaccharide sample was mixed with KBr, which was then pressed into a sheet, and scanning analysis was performed at 4000 cm −1 -500 cm −1 using a Nicolet6700 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) Fourier transform infrared spectrometer [53].

Monosaccharide Composition Analysis
A polysaccharide sample of 5.0 mg ± 0.05 mg was accurately weighed, and then 1.0 mL of 2 M TFA solution was added and hydrolyzed at 121 • C for 2 h. The solvent was dried with nitrogen and cleaned 2-3 times with methanol. ddH 2 O was added to dissolve the hydrolysate and was transferred to a chromatographic flask for testing. The chromatography system was the Thermo ICS5000 ion chromatography system (ICS5000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), which used an electrochemical detector to analyze and detect monosaccharide components. At the same time, quantitative analysis of each monosaccharide was conducted using the external standard method. Adopting

Methylation Analysis
Methylation analysis of the polysaccharide sample was performed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The polysaccharide sample was dissolved in 500 µL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), then 1.0 mg of NaOH was added and the sample was incubated for 30 min. After incubation, 50 µL iodomethane solution was added for 1 h. After the reaction was completed, 1.0 mL H 2 O and 2.0 mL of dichloromethane were added and mixed evenly with a vortex. The mixture was centrifuged, and the aqueous phase was discarded. Taken a sample of a certain concentration, and added 2M TFA to the sample and reacted at 121 • C for 90 min. The sample was allowed to dry at 30 • C. An amount of 50 µL ammonia (2 M) and 50 µL NaBD4 (1 M) were added to the evaporated sample, which was thoroughly mixed and reacted at room temperature for 2.5 h. Subsequently, we added 20 µL acetic acid to stop the reaction. After being dried by nitrogen, acetic anhydride (250 µL) was added, and the solution was vortexed and incubated. We then added 500 µL dichloromethane followed by vortex centrifugation and discarding of the aqueous phase. The lower dichloromethane phase was passed through a 0.45 µM filter membrane for on-line detection [56].

NMR Spectroscopy Analysis
The purified polysaccharide was fully dissolved in D 2 O to prepare a 40 mg·mL −1 polysaccharide solution. The solution (0.5 mL) was placed in a nuclear magnetic tube and the nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer (Bruker 600 MHz) was used to scan the 1 H and 13 C spectra of one-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance, as well as the COSY, HSQC, HMBC and NOESY spectra of two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance [57].

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis
After coating the dried polysaccharide with 25 nm thickness ion sputtering (Pt/At powder), the sample was observed at a potential of 5 kV under a vacuum condition by a scanning electron microscope (QuantaTM FEG SEM, Stoney Creek, NC, USA). The magnification range was from 5000 to 20,000 times [58].

Analysis of Intracellular ROS and Inflammatory Factors
The experimental groups were as follows: control group (normal GES-1 cell group), model group (ethanol treatment), low polysaccharide concentration group (250 µg·mL −1 + EtOH), medium polysaccharide concentration group (500 µg·mL −1 + EtOH) and high polysaccharide concentration group (1000 µg·mL −1 + EtOH). Cells were digested routinely and counted to obtain 5.0 × 10 4 cells·well −1 in a 96-well plate, 100 cells·µL −1 . After 8 h of cultivation, the supernatant was discarded. Then 20 µL CCK-8 solution was added to each well. After continuing to cultivate for 4 h, the medium was discarded and 150 µL DMSO was added. The 96-well plate was taken out and was left to stand for 1 min. Then the 96-well plate was placed in the microplate reader, the absorbance values of each well were measured at 490 nm, and the reactive oxygen species were calculated in each group. IL-8, TNF-α, and IL-1β in the supernatant of GES-1 cells in each group were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [59]. The ROS of cells in each group were analyzed using the dichloro-dihydro-fluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) method.

Apoptosis Analysis by Flow Cytometry
Cells were digested routinely and seeded in a 6-well plate, including 2.0 mL medium·well −1 . The cells in each group were collected for detection after 8 h of cultivation according to the groups described above. Double-distilled water was used to dilute the 5× binding buffer. The binding buffer was diluted as follows: 1× binding Buffer in 0.5 mL final volume. We mixed 5.0 µL Annexin V and 10.0 µL propidium iodide (PI) to prepare the Annexin V/PI dye working solution. The old cell culture medium was discarded and 2.0 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)/well was added to gently rinse the cells in the culture plate. The PBS was then removed, 1.0 mL of 0.25% trypsin was added into each well and the plate was incubated. Under the microscope, when the cells were loose, 2.0 mL PBS was added to prepare the single cell suspension. The Annexin V/PI dye working solution (200 µL) was then added, cells were re-suspended, blown gently, and incubated in the dark for 15 min before detection by flow cytometer [60].

Statistical Analysis
The test results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 23.0 and all data analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out using the LSD test.

Conclusions
In this experiment, an active polysaccharide (VUP80-3) was extracted from V. unguiculata. The main chain of VUP80-3 may be →4)-α-D-Glcp(1→ and →4)-α-D-Galp(1→, the branch chain may be →3,4)-β-D-Glcp(1→, →4,6)-α-D-Glcp(1→, and sugar terminated α-D-Glcp(1→. The biological activity test showed that VUP80-3 performed well in vitro to repair damaged gastric mucosal cells. The results suggested that 1000 µg·mL −1 of VUP80-3 could significantly increase the activity of ethanol injured GES-1 cells (p < 0.01), significantly reduce the levels of ROS and inflammatory factors in ethanol injured GES-1 cells (p < 0.05) and reduce the rate of apoptosis (p < 0.05). Therefore, this polysaccharide significantly reduced the oxidative damage caused by ethanol in GES-1 cells. These data suggest that VUP80-3 is a potential drug that can be used to protect the gastric mucosa from damage. However, does VUP80-3 improve inflammatory factors in gastric mucosal cells by reducing ROS in cells? What is the specific role of decreased apoptosis rate in inhibiting gastric mucosal injury? Is there a relationship between mucosal secretion and alcohol exposure on the gene level? Furthermore, the signal pathway of VUP80-3 protecting gastric mucosal cells needs further study.